• Because of interpretation change within a reasonable range, there is nothing wrong.
• Based on the basic principles of democracy, the bills that have been exhausted should be voted.
• It is indispensable to materialize active pacifism. The principle of exclusive defense is properly protected.
• Because the security environment is deteriorating, deterrence against foreign countries is necessary.
• Since it is obvious that the draft system is unconstitutionality, the opinion that "conscription system will be revived" itself is leaping.

Deterrence
It is the ability to discourage activities.
For example
A says "I do not like C, let's mean to C"
B says "But, because C is a regular in the rugby club, it's better to quit."
A says "(Oh ... okay, I'm scared of retaliation ...) Yeah! Let's stop it!"

• Contrary to where we are going on forced voting without obtaining public understanding.
• There is no concrete explanation as to what exercise right of collective self-defense in any case.
• I am worriedthat the conscription system will come out by changing the interpretation of the Constitution.
• Because the security environment is deteriorating, deterrence against foreign countries is necessary.
• The range of activities of JSDF will expand and risk increases.

Exclusive defense
Basic policy in defense of Japan according to the principle of constitution. It defends only when it receives an armed attack from the other country, its defense is set to the minimum necessary for self-defense, and the defense power to hold is also limited to the minimum necessary for self-defense.