America


The United States In the United States, I record average number of births per woman with more than of 2.0 unlike most developed countries.
In late years a business school, the specialized graduate schools such as the law school spread, and the woman who got high educational background came to reach the stairs to promotion.
In addition, a woman aiming at a carrier and coexistence of the delivery became high in delivery age naturally, and a technique of the infertility treatment came to be demanded.

Mother having a young child continues the United States after the 1980s and came to set to work, but there is a big difference for the way of mother and the child care. There is no paid maternity leave.
Because the childcare service in the United States is the private service center, a placement standard and the system of the childcare person are decided by childcare service はなくで common throughout the whole country, a state.
On the other hand, a standard of working conditions, a salary, the welfare program of the childcare person in charge in the childcare spot is low, and the problems such as not colonizing are pointed out.

 

China

Because population growth exceeded growth of the quantity of chapter and verse production in China in the 1970s, I took "the one-child policy" and pushed forward a late marriage and dealt with a kind treatment in the home of the only child and inflicted a penalty on the home that had children more than two again.
However, I rationalized the second because the couples who did not have a child by oneself in 2002 increased.
By the city development of the farm village part, there is few it, and it lays it that it was thought that there should be many children as a real worker, and raise the each person's quality of the child; move.
As for the birth rate, it becomes はは approximately 1.8 now in 1970 to have been 5.8.


Singapore


The population of Singapore increased from the early 1900s.
However, when the Singaporean government which had only limited land carried out two kid policy" and had children more than three, a delivery expense became higher, and credit for dependents was reduced and was given a penalty not to be able to enter the elementary school to hope for. However, I reversed myself from 1987 and came to encourage delivery. Income tax reduced the family with more than of three children and became able to pour it into the hope elementary school again.
In addition, in "the baby bonus system introduced from 2001 ," there is the reserving system that the government intervened in as well as the perinatal cash payment of the child.
The amount of money from the third child is high and understands that I want you to have a child more than three people well both.


It is from 1987, and the correspondence for the third child is like reverse until 1987. W

hy would it become in this way?

It seems to be related that a married woman did not have a child more than expected and that population ages rapidly

In addition, the government began "romance thing Singapore" campaign in 2003.
It is a very unique plan called "the government-manufactured marriage meeting" that the government provides the place of the encounter to the single man and woman.
I campaign for the rise in birth rate (population growth) in this way.


Australia

 

In Australia, I paid a maternity allowance and baby bonus separately from medical payment in the public hospital by the Medicare until now. I have begun to provide with delivery payment to be able to be called "the new baby bonus" that unified these to support a financial burden with the delivery from July, 2004.
This applies to all families who had delivery regardless of income level and I do the amount of payment to Japanese Yen at the time of a supply start of 2004 and it was approximately 250,000 yen, but increases it steadily every year.


Norway





A subject was considered to be it, and, in Norway, declining birthrate measures rose the birth rate from the 1980s. However, the declining birthrate measures continued being strengthened until the mid-1990s, but the birth rate is decreasing again from about 90.  In Norway, there is what's called "quota system" that the nature of either obliges the political party not to be less than 40% of candidates. As a result, a Diet member of the women is approximately 36%, and support to child care becomes abundant by just that much.  The vacation accepted in Norway in 2007 is up to 54 weeks. Because the salary during these leaves of absence is 80-100%, and it is paid by nation insurance, there are few burdens on company.  There was the time when the birth rate dropped in the 1980s. There was not father who acquired a vacation in spite of having been admitted that mother shared the paid leave for parent of one of time with father in 18 weeks in before childbirth, after giving birth of mother.  Thereafter, the government continued extending vacation almost every year and spread in 52 weeks in 89, and a right made new system "Father quater" which became extinct if I did not acquire allotment, it to father again between four weeks of those in 93.  Thanks to this "Father quater ," more than 90% of father takes the parental leave now. In addition, it is famous that the Minister of Finance took the 4-week parental leave using Father quater. "Father quater" extended afterwards for six weeks. In addition, it is cooperative with at-home child care. For "a 1 year old child, a 2 years old child ," A sum same as the subsidy of the country which is paid for a nursery school when I leave a child with a nursery school in full-time I pay it for a parent bringing up home child in cash without using the nursery school There is system, I would be provided with the same frame even if "I brought you up in a house" even if "I left it with a nursery school", and equitableness was in this way born.


What do not have you support it when you do not leave it with a nursery school is not surely fair a?