There are aggressive comments for revising constitution.
But in other hand, there are also the movements that defenses Constitution of Japan from the movements revising the constitution.
What reasons make their opinions against movements revising constitution?
We’d like to think the 3 of focuses that we’ve given you article 9, 96, and the above.
The important things in talking about the defense of constitution are article 9 and the above.
Then, what are common to the two things? They are about peace of japan.
After 70 years since World War Ⅱ, Japan has never intervened in the war, so obtained high value as a peaceful country and leading the world.
There are not a little constitutions which is called “peaceful constitution” in all over the world, but among them, what sais that “Without permanent war forever and also army throw away forever” like article 9 is rare. In 2014, it was nominated to the Nobel Peace Prize.
So it is looked as top-class peaceful constitution from the world.
The above is very important because it sais that ”Japanese hope that the peace continues forever”.
However, revising constitution buffers these controls, so the position as a special peaceful country of Japan may bown.
In general, the country will have forces, but Japan doesn’t.
So Japan is a special country, but Japan will have the force if it revises the constitution.
To have the forces is easy, but to throw away is difficult. Japan lost most of the people, and threw away them first.
Article 9 is in Japan because of it. It mustn’t be realize again and never, and we must tell how miserable it was for the next generation.
Article 9 is the symbol of this experience, and we must protect it.
Much more, making the forces might make Japan join to the war.
The people who have “Defense the constitution” opinion say that.
Like these, the opinions which say “We will have the forces again and we might experience the miserable situation.” make the people move to defense.
Another focus is about article 96.
Revise opinions say “Rigid constitution and the number that 2/3 keep away the discussion”. And Lib. Dems tries the hurdle down like “More than the half of all the diet” in their plan.
But defense opinions say “The number more than 2/3 is right”. Why?
Constitution of Japan has the one of the highest hurdles in the world to revise, because it is called “Rigid constitution”.
Constitution of Japan was made unlikely not to be changed easily.
“More than 2/3” “of all the diets” is very high hurdle in the world.
However, if the hurdle made too low, it is without the concept of rigid constitution.
◎Total revising or part revising
Defense side opinions are not only them, but also like this one.
We explained that it is minor to revise the constitution total like Japan.
Total revising means that it denies the basic part of the constitution.
It is minor to revise it total, and it is major to revise some parts in the world.
Constitution of Japan maybe against for the era, but it have protected Japan from the wars. Why do we deny it? This is an opinion which “defenses” the constitution, too.
There are the difference opinions not only revising or defensing, but also how we revise it.
There is the opinion to revise. In contrast, there is the opinion to defense.
We are happy if you understand that.
And two opinions meet and born the concept of “discuss”
In next page, we’d like to introduce a lot of opinions to the revising the constitution.
Copyright (c) 2014 Kemportant! All Rights Reserved.
