TOP>Current status of reform>Characteristic reform>Through in-house systems of various companies

Through in-house systems of various companies


We have seen specific examples of Sansan, Xymax and Okamura's internal systems.
This page summarizes what you learned and learned from the interview.

A common feature we've seen so far is

  1.   There are many systems that can be changed by people.
  2.   He recommends teleworking so that he can work outside the company office.
  3.   We value the will of our employees in all aspects, not just labor.

The most important thing in these work style reforms is to think carefully about the freedom of employees.
By presenting a variety of working styles (specific examples, Sansan), the company is free from employees being tied to a single working style, and choosing a method that is easier to work with each other, resulting in better work efficiency and, as a result, It leads to overall performance.
People who rent an office like ZXY Share in a corporation or encourage them to work from home can be more efficient if they find it difficult to work in the office.
 Like Geek Seek of Sansan, you can freely order what you need for work. A system that allows you to easily meet senior people, such as the president, like Terrunch. Some companies were able to talk about anything right away, and they were free to talk about the relationship and money.

2,Opinions on current work style reform by each company


Let's ask these four companies for their opinions on the reforms that work today.

What do you think about the current work style reform?

There are many situations where fundamental reforms tend to occur, and fundamental solutions have not been achieved. I think the fundamental solution is that all workers can face their essential tasks. For example, simply doing work that anyone can do is wasteful, wasteful and costly. I think that if you use IT tools, you can face tasks that only you can do. And if you use them effectively, you'll get a better job and eventually grow.

We believe that work style reforms create working environments and options that are tailored to each individual. And by increasing the choices, you will be able to select the best time and place to work. This makes it easier for people who want to work in childcare and nursing care to work, but also makes it easier for companies to use satellite offices like this, which frees up time and place to work and makes them more able to work. I think it will be easier. Also, because overtime is not a waste, it is not a waste of overtime, so it is more important to reduce wasted working hours than to cut down on time.

We believe that the aim of working style reform is not work time reduction but business improvement. In order to improve business, we are focusing on reviewing the meeting method and shortening the meeting time internally. Based on the question "Is the meeting necessary in the first place?", We constantly check and review the appropriate frequency of meetings, meeting times, and participants. Prior to the meeting, the agenda today is shared with the participants, and the effective skills for the discussion are documented and distributed to all employees so that the meeting can proceed smoothly.



To sum up the above four companies' ideas, aren't we not only reducing long working hours but also taking various approaches to reduce waste?

Main in-house system of Okamura Corporation
Country statistics