Content that poses as a reliable source of information. This category includes content
that attempts to manipulate the impressions of recipients of spoofed information by
manipulating images and text.
Since the images and other information that are supposed to be trustworthy and reliable
are processed, it is easy to gain trust despite the fact that it is fake news, and it is easy to
manipulate the impression.
Again, even though the possibility of editing is widely known, the credibility of "images" remains high. Images make people think that they have actually witnessed the scene where the image was taken, and they often consider their opinions based on their unconscious belief that what they see in the image is fact. This is why people are more susceptible to being deceived by fake news when images are manipulated and fakes are mixed with believable images.
In early 2021, an earthquake with a seismic intensity of 6.0 on the Japanese scale struck
Fukushima and Miyagi prefectures as they worked to recover from the Great East Japan
Earthquake. The government took urgent measures in response and held a press
conference. The press conference went without a hitch and seemed to have ended without
a hitch. However, after the press conference, a controversial photo of the press conference
spread on Twitter, attracting a lot of criticism. The subject of the photo was the then Chief
Cabinet Secretary, Katsunobu Kato, who attended and responded to the press conference.
In the photo, Mr. Kato is seen answering questions with a smile next to a ticker tape
indicating that he is holding a press conference, despite the urgency and the fact that many
people are still suffering. People who saw the photo naturally raised their voices in
condemnation, accusing Mr. Kato of being inappropriate. One of the posts with the image
attached was retweeted about 2000 times, with comments such as "This is no time to be
smiling" and "This is unforgivable".
The image is a cutout of a televised program of the press conference, and as far as we
can tell, there are no unnatural parts found in the photo. It looks as if Mr. Kato actually held
the press conference while laughing. However, if you look at the actual video of the press
conference, you will not see Mr. Kato smiling during the press conference. It does not mean
that the program from which the image was cut out arbitrarily replaced the image of Mr.
Kato in a different scene and used it. In creating this image, it was not his intention or the
program's editing that altered the image, but the image itself. When the Yomiuri Shimbun
questioned the difference between the actual video of the press conference and the
disseminated image that is being accused, they asked a professor with digital data analysis
skills to analyze it, and found that the eyes and mouth were most likely altered. Mr. Kato
had actually held a sincere press conference that was far from inappropriate, and the
image that was the cause of the accusations was a "fake" spoofed image.
One of the frightening aspects of this case is that the images were so elaborate that none
of the accusers could notice anything wrong with them. According to Professor Uehara,
who was asked to evaluate the images
Professor Uehara, who appraised the images, said, "It's not easy to distinguish them by
elaboration". It is impossible for the general public to distinguish images that even professors,
who are far better at appraising images than ordinary people, can only find a few traces of,
and the fact that fake images of such sophistication are circulating shows that incidents
such as this one can happen at any time. This is also due to the fact that it is no longer
difficult to create fake images. In fact, this image was created only 30 minutes after the start
of the press conference, and special software and smartphone applications that use AI to
alter facial expressions are already in widespread use overseas, making it possible to
deceive people with little effort.
As the technology to combat fake news is developing day by day, so are the skills of those who maliciously create fake news. As a result, there is a non-negligible amount of video that has been "edited" to make it look more like the truth, and what should have been believable footage has become unbelievable. And the falsification of "images,"which should be trusted, tends to cause more damage than other fake news items.
There is something called "Deep Faking". As the name implies, it is a type of fake news,
in which artificial intelligence, or AI, can completely replace the faces of people in a video or
manipulate the expressions of people in an image at will. In recent years, the quality of this
technology has increased dramatically, and it is even possible to create videos that look so
natural that they could be mistaken for the person themselves. In addition, the mechanism
for creating these videos is so simplified that it is possible to create them without
knowledge or ability in video editing. This is why deep fakes are not widely used in Japan,
but overseas, deep fake videos are spreading to the extent that they need to be regulated,
and the damage is growing in proportion.
In early 2018, the following video was posted on YouTube in which former President
Barack Obama talks about then-President Trump.
video was posted on YouTube in which former President Barack Obama talks about then-President Trump.→(https://youtu.be/cQ54GDm1eL0)
In this video, Mr. Obama blasted Mr. Trump and even appeared to state that "President Trump is
an irredeemable moron." It is hard to believe that Obama would make such a statement
since he was the first black U.S. president who made great achievements in desegregation.
However, this seems to be a fact, as the city of Obama in the video does indeed say the
words of refuge from his mouth. To tell you the truth, this video was made as an example to
show the current deep-faking technology. Created by the American online media company
BuzzFeed and actor/director Jordan Peele, the video splits in two as it progresses to the
second half, showing President Obama speaking as he did in the first half of the video, and
director Peele moving at the exact same time as Obama. All of Obama's lines and
movements in this video were made to look as if Obama was actually speaking by
reflecting Peele's words and actions on Obama's photo.
This example was a harmless deep fake, created without malice and intended to draw
attention. But, of course, there are many fake news and deep fakes in the world that are
made to deceive people with malicious intent, and this video was made because there are
many of them, and many of them have the potential to do a lot of damage. In the same way
that the AI-enhanced video looked just as good as the real Obama speaking in this video,
the maliciously created video also appeared to be true, as if he were actually speaking.
Naturally, the technology for countermeasures has evolved to the point where it is on par
with the rest of the world, and various countermeasures have been taken, including the use
of AI to detect and identify the slightest discomfort, such as a lack of blinking. However,
those who create fake news with clear malicious intentions have an advantage over those
who take countermeasures in that they can construct countermeasures against
countermeasures, and this is why malicious, high-quality deep fakes will never disappear.
Therefore, it is important to remember that no matter how true a story may seem, it cannot
be considered reliable without cross-referencing multiple sources.
The technology to create fake images and videos is evolving day by day. "It is possible to create fake images" that will fool all the viewers, as in the case of the overseas example, or to edit high quality images in a short time, as in the case of the Japanese example. As technology has improved, so has the ease of creation, and even people without editing skills are now able to create fake images and videos simply by obtaining software from overseas. Therefore, in addition to the two examples introduced here, various fake images and videos have been discovered on the Internet today, and some of them may still remain undiscovered and believed. And that also suggests that there are people who are being accused of innocent crimes because their fake images were believed. Now that we are surrounded by various fake news, what we can do is not to believe the information but to check the authenticity of the information before speaking out.